|
In
2001, parents are far less likely to put up with the
misery of missing their children growing up. The percentage
has plunged from a quarter in 1998 to less than a tenth,
although there has been a slight increase in those postponing
or foregoing parenthood for the sake of their career,
and many parents may feel forced to make the kind of
radical changes that Hicks has chosen.
In
1998, almost 60% said they would not be willing to accept
less money as the price of more time for their personal
lives. In 2001, that proportion has dropped to 53.6%,
with almost a third of women and a quarter of men being
willing to trade pay for time.
This
year, three-quarters of our respondents were male, and
just over a quarter female - a big increase on 1998,
when only 14.3% of the replies came from women. The
gender divide remains in some areas: women report both
greater workload pressure and greater job satisfaction
than men, and men are twice as likely as women to prefer
more traditional ways of working. But some older gender
assumptions have been overturned. Asked if organisations
would be more flexible with women in charge, only 16.3%
agreed.
If our 1998 survey lifted the lid on the extent of our
unhappiness with our work/life balance, our new survey
reveals that we want to think big about the structure
of our working lives, far beyond tinkering with the
time we leave the office. And we don't trust the Government
to help us out - more than half our respondents felt
that government initiatives to improve work/life balance
are either unlikely or not very likely to succeed -
however well meant. Even so, nearly 70% felt that employers
and organisations should be the ones driving change,
while 33% felt it was up to individuals.
Seven
out of 10 people feel that organisations should be the
ones driving change. Less than a fifth think it is the
Government's job
One
of the biggest barriers to change for those organisations
and individuals alike is that the kind of progress we
want is radical, and requires a new set of standards
and skills. We want nothing less than to be given personal
responsibility to perform our work in whatever way suits
us best. But that depends on all those new, soft and
squishy notions like trust and empowerment, which are
difficult to legislate for and almost impossible to
measure. It isn't just our Satanic overlords who need
to develop their EQ for the new world of work - our
survey revealed some fascinating but damning results
in the different ways we perceive ourselves at work
compared with our staff and bosses.
The
overwhelming majority of our managers - nearly 88% -
say they are committed at work, and more than 80% describe
their boss in the same way. Less than 60%, however,
are equally convinced of their staff¥s commitment.
Nearly 96% see themselves as trustworthy at work, and
three-quarters feel their staff are completely trustworthy.
The number who would trust their boss, however, drops
to 62.6%. When it comes to flexibility - either in terms
of personal adaptability to change or flexible working
schedules - our survey revealed similar differences
in the ways our managers see themselves and the people
they work with. Three-quarters of our respondents consider
themselves completely receptive to change at work. Only
half think their boss is equally receptive, and even
fewer - less than 30% - believe their staff are.
This
personal paradox is one of the biggest barriers to change
in the workplace. If we¥re still stuck in old 'us
and them' responses to our bosses and staff, it¥s
fair to assume that most of them are similarly stuck.
The job of an enlightened HR department in the 21st
century is to develop tools that help break down those
responses and build genuine adult/adult relationships
throughout the organisation. Those tools might begin
with surveys and audits to measure levels of trust,
autonomy and responsibility, and workshops, courses,
information and support to help people develop them.
Without those, we're stuck with a case of same book,
different chapter, and all the flexible working in the
world won't create the kind of deep change our managers
are looking for.
Copies of the survey ŚWork/Life Balance: Whose Move
Is It Next?¥ are available from Khyla McBride (tel:
; e-mail: Khyla.McBride)
|